on
January 31st 2006 at 2:52 pm in Interesting spam — mainly the way the return-addresses are put in it. Seems like some fucko wrongly hitting the Paste-key a few times:
For your support and partnership, please reply me to negotiate your fees or the percentage you wish to be paid when the funds arrives your bank account. You must however note that this transaction, with regards to our disposition to co hassan8xx@lycos.co.ukntinue with you, is subject to these terms. Firstly, our conviction of your transparency. Secondly, that you treat this transaction with utmost secrecy and confidentiality.
Finally and above all, that you will provide an account over which you have absolute control. I am looking forward to doing business with you and do solicit your confidentiality in this transaction, Please mail your response to me through my confidential email address,ben_abebe01@katamail.com, hansben3@budweiser.com, for me to update you on our plans as to how we intend to actualize this transaction.
Yeh yeh, sure…
Additionally, I noted the headers — containing some DomainKey which I presume is a anti-spamming measure. But it obviously does not work:
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by lmfilto01.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with ESMTP
id 5F3D9357B11; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 12:28:18 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from cmcodec04.st1.spray.net ([212.78.203.80])
by localhost (lmfilto01.st1.spray.net [212.78.202.32]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 31055-01; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 12:28:18 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from cmcodec04.st1.spray.net (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by cmcodec04.st1.spray.net (Postfix) with SMTP
id F0977CA584; Tue, 31 Jan 2006 12:28:17 +0000 (GMT)
Comment: DomainKeys? See http://antispam.yahoo.com/domainkeys
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=lycos.co.uk;
h=From:Subject;
b=Qiw9ymcWP9ngHHesRYSOR6aVPLh4upTpzTYOIuHKvPYUmCtF8kBcpUj37o7GjbAgHEHQS6h8LkUObYvzDGKhpiShKQNvYNGXxEyMi2+Wtw/pZcQ+PGlSbwGlTy6wA/jHCRzNMSEx0AcBLb4P5KgvGgjtC2Vxecy3XoLkV9rerjo=;
From: “hassan9xx”
no comments 
