I’m an person avidly against the anti-smoking lobby. It’s unfair.
I’ve always defended the position of the smoker, and have always doubted research into this field because, hell, cancer could just as well come from another source, not specifically second-hand smoke (it could be farts, or fuck, this is one of my latest gems: cancer could be caused by (second-hand) ‘religion’ — so I will refrain from making religious remarks in this post because I know what it does, man).
Anyway, everybody ‘defending’ the anti-smoking lobby keep hammering me on the fact that ‘these guys are experts they know their shit’. (Oh, and smoking is ‘dirty’.)
Well, lo’ and behold…… It is possible for ‘experts’ to be wrong for decades, after all:
For decades, efforts to cure the disease may have targeted the wrong cells.’ If true, the discoveries of Canadian and Italian research groups may give us a new path to selectively attack cancer.”
But don’t get your hopes up — knowing ‘man’ we all know there’s bound to be a new thing causing disease all over the planet.

on
November 21st 2006 at 11:17 am in
no comments 








